Unknown's avatar

About drlynrobinson

Academic, Londoner. She/Her

Database State

A small article in April’s Information World Review drew my attention to this report, Database State, by the Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust. Seems there are some vacancies for good information professionals.

Foreword

In October 2007 Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs lost two discs containing a copy of the entire child benefit database. Suddenly issues of privacy and data security were on the front page of most newspapers and leading the TV news bulletins. The old line ‘if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear’ was given a very public rebuttal.

The millions of people affected by this data loss, who may have thought they had nothing to hide, were shown that they do have much to fear from the failures of the database state.

In the wake of the HMRC fiasco, and all the subsequent data losses that came to light in the months that followed, the Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust sponsored a meeting of academics and activists with an interest in privacy. These experts attempted to map Britain’s database state,
identifying the many public sector databases that collect personal information about us. The task proved to be too big for one seminar, highlighting the need for a more in-depth study of the ‘Transformational Government’ programme.

The Trust, therefore, commissioned the Foundation for Information Policy Research to produce this report, which provides the most comprehensive map of Britain’s database state currently available.

Of the 46 databases assessed in this report only six are given the green light. That is, only six are found to have a proper legal basis for any privacy intrusions and are proportionate and necessary in a democratic society. Nearly twice as many are almost certainly illegal under human rights or data protection law and should be scrapped or substantially redesigned, while the remaining 29 databases have significant problems and should be subject to an independent review.

We hope this report will help to highlight the scale of the problem we are facing and inform the ongoing debate about the sort of society we want to live in and how new information systems can help us get there.

 

David Shutt
Lord Shutt of Greetland
Chair of the Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust Ltd.
March 2009″

Midlife Chatterers….

A brief article in today’s Times newspaper caught my eye, suggesting that 45 – 54 year olds are 36 per cent more likely than average to visit the Twitter site – and that in fact (from comScore), the majority of the 10 million Twitter users worldwide are over 35. Is this surprising ? Is it just under 35s who have a constant need to verbalise and connect ? I think we all want to be loved and listened to. Probably more so if you are over 35 ….

… but I am still wondering what to say.

The article can be found here

Twitter #1

Our research student, Liz Poirier, gave a fabulous talk to the masters students last Friday: “From Infomania to Infodiversity. Why libraries should be proud of their slow credentials”. It was all about taking your time, about quality and spending time searching for the one good paper rather than making do with six reasonably ok ones. About slow food. About reading the whole book and paying attention. About whether information science could learn anything from “slow” user behaviour. Libraries, with their books, are inherently “slow”.

I have just joined twitter. I think this is inherently “fast” and feeds my anxiety. I will see if it matters. In the meantime try Slow Down London