Database State

A small article in April’s Information World Review drew my attention to this report, Database State, by the Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust. Seems there are some vacancies for good information professionals.

Foreword

In October 2007 Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs lost two discs containing a copy of the entire child benefit database. Suddenly issues of privacy and data security were on the front page of most newspapers and leading the TV news bulletins. The old line ‘if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear’ was given a very public rebuttal.

The millions of people affected by this data loss, who may have thought they had nothing to hide, were shown that they do have much to fear from the failures of the database state.

In the wake of the HMRC fiasco, and all the subsequent data losses that came to light in the months that followed, the Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust sponsored a meeting of academics and activists with an interest in privacy. These experts attempted to map Britain’s database state,
identifying the many public sector databases that collect personal information about us. The task proved to be too big for one seminar, highlighting the need for a more in-depth study of the ‘Transformational Government’ programme.

The Trust, therefore, commissioned the Foundation for Information Policy Research to produce this report, which provides the most comprehensive map of Britain’s database state currently available.

Of the 46 databases assessed in this report only six are given the green light. That is, only six are found to have a proper legal basis for any privacy intrusions and are proportionate and necessary in a democratic society. Nearly twice as many are almost certainly illegal under human rights or data protection law and should be scrapped or substantially redesigned, while the remaining 29 databases have significant problems and should be subject to an independent review.

We hope this report will help to highlight the scale of the problem we are facing and inform the ongoing debate about the sort of society we want to live in and how new information systems can help us get there.

 

David Shutt
Lord Shutt of Greetland
Chair of the Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust Ltd.
March 2009″

Google Maps / Streetview #2

After nearly a week, Google have sent an email confirming that they have removed the images of my house from Streetview. It was a nice email, apologizing for any inconvenience. But, yes – having to write at all was inconvenient. I have checked, and the image has been removed from all angles along the street, with only one smallish view left, although as this is obscured by trees, I am satisfied.

I wonder about updates – will Streetview be updated ?

Will I have to make another request for the images to be removed ?

Does this stuff get archived by anyone ?

I have mentioned my concerns about privacy to several people. It seems I am in a minority in worrying that highly detailed images of my family home are available to the entire world for inspection. I have read in the newspapers that some people are really pleased that their homes and cars feature in a prominent role; even more pleased if they can identify themselves in nearby locations. I guess if you can’t get on reality tv you have another chance with Streetview. What about linking all those cctv cameras to Google Maps too, so our friends and family can watch us admiringly in realtime ?